Is there any justification for this expropriation of land? - [10]The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Land Grabbing, by expelling Palestinians, building residential, seizing, and cleansing
Palestinian land. Separation walls, partitions, because they are chosen rats..
“ The fact that the Arabs fled in terror, because of real fear of a
repetition of the 1948 Zionist massacres, is no reason for
denying them their homes, fields
and livelihoods. Civilians
caught in an area of military activity generally panic.
But they have always been able to return to their homes when the danger subsides. Military conquest does not abolish private rights to property;
nor does it entitle the victor to confiscate the homes,
property and personal belongings
of the noncombatant civilian
population. The seizure of Arab property
by the Israelis was an outrage.”
Sami Hadawi, “Bitter Harvest.”
How about the negotiations after the 1948-1949 war?
“[At Lausanne,]Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinians were trying
to save by negotiations what they had lost in the
war—a Palestinian state along-side Israel. Israel, however… [preferred] tenuous
armistice agreements to a definite
peace that would involve
territorial concessions and the repatriation of even a token number of refugees. The refusal to recognize the
Palestinians’ right to self-determination and statehood proved
over the years to be the main
source of the turbulence,
violence, and bloodshed that came to pass.” Israeli author,
Simha Flapan, “The Birth Of Israel.”
Israel admitted to UN but then reneged on the conditions under which it
was admitted
“The [Lausanne] conference officially opened on 27 April 1949. On 12 May the [UN’s] Palestine Conciliation Committee reap its only success
when it induced the parties to sign a joint protocol on
the framework for a comprehensive
peace…Israel for the first time
accepted the principle of repatriation
[of the Arab refugees] and the
internationalization of Jerusalem…[but] they
did so as a mere exercise in
public relations aimed at strengthening Israel’s international image… Walter Eytan, the head of the Israeli delegation,
[stated]
…‘My main purpose was to begin to undermine the protocol of 12 May,
which we had signed only under duress of our struggle for
admission to the UN. Refusal
to sign would…have immediately
been reported to the Secretary-General
and the various governments.’ ”
Israeli historian, Ilan Pappé, “The Making of
the Arab-Israel Conflict,
1947-1951.”
Comments
Post a Comment